From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 16:03:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BD416A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACD243F3F; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:03:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hB803oml026612; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 19:03:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 19:03:50 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <200312072047.hB7KlXp0099493@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ia64/ia64 machdep.c src/sys/ia64/include ucontext.h src/lib/libpthread/arch/ia64/include pthread_md.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 00:03:52 -0000 On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > marcel 2003/12/07 12:47:33 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/ia64/ia64 machdep.c > sys/ia64/include ucontext.h > lib/libpthread/arch/ia64/include pthread_md.h > Log: > Simplify the contexts created by the kernel and remove the related > flags. We now create asynchronous contexts or syscall contexts only. > Syscall contexts differ from the minimal ABI dictated contexts by > having the scratch registers saved and restored because that's where > we keep the syscall arguments and syscall return values. > Since this change affects KSE, have it use kse_switchin(2) for the > "new" syscall context. Can we go back to using per-thread locks for the spinlocks instead of the KSE locks now (go back to rev 1.18 of thr_spinlock.c)? -- Dan Eischen