From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 01:18:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF6C97F for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 01:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C3C1EC6 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 01:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 16so8928623iea.17 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:18:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RpYaKOzVHpPMw0su4RR2PadTK9P6R8qJmVQPDairGcA=; b=JlLnA5XocJQaU4PvQK6ngBzaOR4bhbb+bffJ9pCZeyODGb3V7LdoWiMS8dsmwuOTUx Mu2kL/0/rsgUw9qmwLhEBdYM+R3/nfU9xsKyJrTNMvP7NtXJZDbu36dbBTJhoYVWjU4C mt6JGMP8mzT9UJa6dftaopQaH18jW0x28jBAos9gvhESAn4LDRZWTZm3jvqUpaycSJVk eFqZ6HrP+Oqs4Zt/444Y96gHa0TFDH8i/c9lt4vEldlsrPmq5AiSHMcT9Sn1fNOmrulZ /wsDICXXyhad+TwEtHF/EIOm4nyDQaJ/rtKw4HkU8GnAq1aeeEVaSIlqu2Lo3bQcdNPt 3ucA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.128.36 with SMTP id nl4mr7900960igb.38.1373246300571; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.221.179 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:18:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9478BFAE-550D-485C-97FD-6F669F5B88EE@gmail.com> References: <94A3DD2E-F2E2-4302-8197-BAB213641E2F@gmail.com> <9478BFAE-550D-485C-97FD-6F669F5B88EE@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 20:18:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XHCI umass support breaks between r248085 and r252560 on 9-STABLE From: Scot Hetzel To: Alexandre Kovalenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 01:18:22 -0000 On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Alexandre Kovalenko wrote: > > SIde question (I have been off the lists for a while): is it now consider= ed polite to top-post? It was frowned upon way back when=85 if it still is = not, I do apologize, but I can see no good way to fix it at this point. > > Side Answer: I believe that it preferred that you don't top-post on the lists. To get around GMail's top-post issue: - just delete the first 2 lines in the reply - scroll thru the quoted message deleting what isn't relevant to your reply - inline your responses to the relevant parts of the message --=20 DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.