Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 09:15:57 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224239] security/base-audit: add some improvements to files/405.pkg-base-audit.in and etc Message-ID: <bug-224239-13-c4GX51O7ik@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-224239-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-224239-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224239 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> --- I am not strongly against these changes but... the script it-self imitates 410.pkg-audit (because it does the same thing for base, instead of packages) If you look in to 410.pkg-audit (installed by pkg), you will see the same variable names with just s/pkgaudit/baseaudit/: daily_status_security_pkgaudit_expiry daily_status_security_pkgaudit_chroots daily_status_security_pkgaudit_jails daily_status_security_pkgaudit_enable daily_status_security_pkgaudit_quiet So I don't think it is good to change it in base-audit script. Both are doing the same thing. It is not good for users to have these mixe= d in periodic.conf daily_status_security_pkgaudit_expiry daily_status_security_pkgaudit_chroots daily_status_security_pkgaudit_jails daily_status_security_pkgaudit_enable daily_status_security_pkgaudit_quiet security_status_baseaudit_enable security_status_baseaudit_period security_status_baseaudit_quiet security_status_baseaudit_chroots security_status_baseaudit_jails security_status_baseaudit_expiry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224239-13-c4GX51O7ik>