Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 May 2007 21:05:35 +0200
From:      Martin Hudec <corwin@aeternal.net>
To:        'FreeBSD Questions' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: CVS release tag for current patched release
Message-ID:  <463E26FF.8030507@aeternal.net>
In-Reply-To: <2AD6FC99-694F-4633-8945-771CFA7B35EA@goldmark.org>
References:  <2AD6FC99-694F-4633-8945-771CFA7B35EA@goldmark.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> The short version of my question is whether the cvs tag RELENG_6_2 
> refers to the latest on the 6.2 STABLE branch or the 6.2 RELEASE Branch.

RELENG_6 - actual -STABLE
RELENG_6_2 - actual -RELEASE-pX

-RELEASE are taken off -STABLE at predefined times, and as such we can 
say, that -RELEASE is snapshot from -STABLE at the date of new release. 
Development is being done in -STABLE.

So if you want to have current release with it's patchlevels as they 
are, use RELENG_6_2.

> I wish to make some minor local modifications to my system running 6.2 
> RELEASE p4.  So far, I've been maintaining my system using csup with a 
> sup file based on
> 
>   /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
> 
> But my local changes get overwritten with each new update using csup.  I 
> was advised earlier on this list to use cvs instead (which I thought 
> csup did, but now I see that csup (and cvsup) will use "checkout" mode 
> instead of "CVS mode" unless I'm on the bleeding edge.

Copy this file somewhere else, like /usr/local/etc and modify it as you 
need. Whole cvsup command would look like:

# cvsup -L 2 /usr/local/etc/stable-supfile

kind regards,
Martin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463E26FF.8030507>