From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 17 18:32: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283ED14BD3 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:32:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA18439; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:31:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:31:47 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200001180231.SAA18439@apollo.backplane.com> To: Iani Brankov Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The stack size for a process? References: <3883AC8A.7A6F7D5F@bulinfo.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Hi, : :after making world of a CURRENT cvsupped yesterday, one of my :applications stopped working because of a Segmentation fault. : :The C procedure where the problem pops has about 64k local variables. :here's the assembly output of the procedure's beginning: : :0x805bb60 : pushl %ebp :0x805bb61 : movl %esp,%ebp :0x805bb63 : subl $0x1000c,%esp :0x805bb69 : pushl %edi : : :The Segmentation fault happens when the process tries to push %edi in :the stack, which has been just decreased by 0x1000c. : :here's the stack in the beginning of main(): :esp 0xbfbfd744 :ss 0x27 : :and after the fault: :esp 0xbfacae68 :ss 0x27 : :If I decrease the size of the local vars, it goes ok. : :It's interesting, because I made a simple test using 640k local vars, :and it worked! : :void ab() { : char buf[655360]; : buf[0] = 0; : buff[655359] = 0; :} : :main () { : ab(); :} : : :--iani At your csh prompt type 'limit'. If you are using bash type 'ulimit -a'. When I compile and run your program it works fine on my box. I tried compiling it -O0, -O1, and -O2. % cc x.c -o x -O0 % ./x % -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message