From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 14:42:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91981ED0 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@alogreentechnologies.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.224.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393608FC16 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from X220.ovitrap.com ([122.129.203.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qAGEg2lW019129; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:42:03 -0700 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:42:01 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: Johnny Billquist Subject: Re: Unified BSD? Message-ID: <20121116214201.61eda6a7@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <50A64530.2080808@update.uu.se> References: <20121113104511.GA2362@cs.uni-bonn.de> <50A5F994.9080307@mu.org> <1C35F6E4-4A43-43C4-8256-17C58E8F8F01@hub.org> <50A64530.2080808@update.uu.se> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:18:50 +0000 Cc: Joost van de Griek , Alfred Perlstein , misc@openbsd.org, Hub- FreeBSD , users@dragonflybsd.org, netbsd-users@netbsd.org, tomas.bodzar@gmail.com, Ignatios Souvatzis , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:42:47 -0000 Hi, On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:52:48 +0100 Johnny Billquist wrote: > On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD > > wrote: > >> > >> Actually, according to what we are tracking at > >> http://bsdstats.org, there are currently *8*: > >> > >> PC-BSD > >> FreeBSD > >> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD) > >> DesktopBSD > >> OpenBSD > >> NetBSD > >> DragonflyBSD > >> MidnightBSD > >> > > > > Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a > > long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be > > same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums > > doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs > > (Open/Net/Free/Dfly). > > I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. > There is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no > matter how many systems were installed. the number of FreeBSD installations for Indonesia seem also very, very low. We would have 20% of the installation base then. Erich