From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Apr 10 13:17:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA27282
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nero.in-design.com (root@nero.in-design.com [204.157.146.146])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA27277
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from archive@localhost)
	by nero.in-design.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA26737;
	Thu, 10 Apr 1997 16:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 16:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Intuitive Design Archive <archive@in-design.com>
To: Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
cc: Chris Bura <chris@main.netcorps.com>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sprint or MCI ??
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970410152852.3046C-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970410161148.26720A-100000@nero.in-design.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Steve wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Chris Bura wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We're trying to decide between Sprint or MCI for our T1 service.
> > They both have the good sales pitches.  
> > 
> > 	Sprint says they're all IP and MCI mixes frame with IP.
> > 	MCI says they have 40% of the internet traffic.
> 
> I only have experience with uunet, and sprint - and I like sprint.  They
> give you a full T1, not a stuffed one, and arent down much.  They have had
> troubles in the past - everybody does.
> 
> 
	Since we are questioning who to use, can someone tell me anything 
about that following providers:

	Bell North East
	crl.com 
	uunet

	I am looking for either frame relay, smds, or a DS1.  Can anyone out 
there tell me their experience with any of the above?

						Intuitive Design Archive 
						http://www.in-design.com
						archive@in-design.com