From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 28 18:41:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from proxy4.ba.best.com (proxy4.ba.best.com [206.184.139.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9341214EE8 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:41:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from GregoryC@stcinc.com) Received: from stcinc.com (gw-covad768k-cognitivetech.ncal.verio.com [207.20.238.29] (may be forged)) by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id SAA07581; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:38:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38190075.D9705BC4@stcinc.com> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:03:33 -0700 From: Gregory Carvalho Reply-To: GregoryC@stcinc.com Organization: Simplified Technology Company X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Adam Woodbeck (KEYKERTUSA)" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Network performance woes under FreeBSD 3.2. Please help! References: <0039010009149140000002L102*@MHS> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does your switch support full-duplex, the docs tend to lack such unnecessary data. It sounds to me as though you should attempt to let the xl0 autonegotiate at half-duplex. Alternatively you could force the Intel card to half-duplex with: ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.20.30.40 netmask 255.255.255.0 media 100baseTX mediaopt half-duplex" (all that should be on one line) in /etc/rc.conf. I hope this helps. Cordially, Gregory Carvalho GregoryC@stcinc.com Simplified Technology Company http://www.stcinc.com In God I Trust! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message