From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 12 10:40:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04826 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from www.scancall.no (www.scancall.no [195.139.183.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA04729 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:39:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Marius.Bendiksen@scancall.no) Received: from super2.langesund.scancall.no [195.139.183.29] by www with smtp id HHQWOFNJ; Wed, 12 Aug 98 17:39:08 GMT (PowerWeb version 4.04r6) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980812193700.0092f220@mail.scancall.no> X-Sender: Marius@mail.scancall.no X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:37:00 +0200 To: Brett Glass From: Marius Bendiksen Subject: Re: UDP port 31337 Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199808121735.LAA00738@lariat.lariat.org> References: <3.0.5.32.19980812192128.0097a2a0@mail.scancall.no> <199808121700.LAA00346@lariat.lariat.org> <3.0.5.32.19980812112915.0092ead0@mail.scancall.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Oh. In other words, "the wrong person" would just happen to be running the >Back Orifice program and attempting to break into your system? Not bloody >likely. Ever heard of IP spoofing? In any case, as I said, it's principally wrong to escalate a conflict by retaliation. Besides which, it's illegal too. --- Marius Bendiksen, IT-Trainee, ScanCall AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message