From owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Fri Jan 20 04:52:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A042ACB94F0 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF9B1C48 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0K4qTLs034005 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:52:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216127] sbin/restore doesn't honour extended attributes (extattr on ufs) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:52:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:52:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216127 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to dewayne from comment #11) > The extended attributes are those from both dump files. This may be as i= ntended, or it may not? I don't know. It seems like they are just accumulating naively in that cas= e. Ordinarily I think restores are expected to happen to a pristine filesystem= , or level >0 dumps, from the same source, onto a previous 0-level restore.=20 Conflicting restores are sort of a weird case. > Though, if we restore the user mode, owner and times of a restored, file;= I do wonder if only the ext attributes of the latest recovered file should= also replace all previous extended attributes. That does seem like a reasonable behavior to me. > I don't have a use case that assists, as my needs are met by overwriting = the values of the stored keys. However the testing did reveal something th= at probably should be explicit (in the doc?). Probably! I am probably not the right person to make that change, though, = as I'm pretty unfamiliar with restore(8). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=