Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:21:21 +0100 From: jedrek <jedrek@t-n-p.org> To: Kep Woof <kep.woof@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "jad@nominet.org.uk" <jad@nominet.org.uk> Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060510142121.GA60560@larissa.t-n-p.org> In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <OFBFAAF909.8425B025-ON8025716A.003B1F41-8025716A.003B18B3@nominet.org.uk> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > However, where were the other designs? =20 I was wondering about that myself... > Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. =20 Netbsd logo is very nice indeed. > The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense > if you previously understand what it represents. The effect is that > it represents nothing in particular, which is why it fails so > fantasically. What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess > something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. Those values > are not communicated in the new logo, and I think that's something > that somebody with freebsd.org in their email address should seriously > address. Kep totally has a point here. Freebsd need's a logo that represents what the name stands for and the "sex toy" isn't it. =20 --=20 jedrek --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYfbhu9djjrPrx0YRAs08AJ4muSKE5/+zLXqy3+Y55oJCRHE+jACfaCxA Wx2Iops/UHe95ji9C3rYIFw= =wOVh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060510142121.GA60560>