From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 10 16: 6:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7283D37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 87827 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Apr 2002 23:07:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 01:07:06 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Alan E Cc: tg@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] port: python-2.1.2 -> 2.1.3 Message-ID: <20020411010706.A87330@mail.webmonster.de> References: <20020409194743.A42693@mail.webmonster.de> <20020410165222.B79746@mail.webmonster.de> <200204101153.04522.alane@geeksrus.net> <20020410180818.E79746@mail.webmonster.de> <20020410163151.GA82892@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020410163151.GA82892@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>; from alane@geeksrus.net on Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:31:51PM -0400 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alan E(alane@geeksrus.net)@2002.04.10 12:31:51 +0000: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:08:18PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > >Alan E(alane@geeksrus.net)@2002.04.10 11:53:04 +0000: > >> On Wednesday 10 April 2002 10:52, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > >> > in followup to my last mail including the make changes as files, her= e is > >> > a patch against the ports tree as of today, 15:40 CEST. it applies f= rom > >> > /usr/ports and updates bsd.python.mk, python21 and py-tkinter to the > >> > 2.1.3 python bugfix version. > >>=20 > >> FYI I have an open PR (36353) against Python 2.1, and whichever patch = goes in=20 > >> first will invalidate the other (for Makefile only). It's not a big de= al (my=20 > >> patch bumps PORTREVISION, you bump PORTVERSION).=20 > > > >this should be resolved first, then. it is just a "works for me[tm]" > >fix, since i am neither a make or ports subsystem guru. since zope had > >severe problems on my freebsd box i needed to fire up py2.1.3 very > >quick. i don't want to have zope going down 8 times a day on a > >production system. >=20 > 0. I don't care which one goes in first, as long as they both go in. IMO > neither one has any inherent priority. However, yours won't go in as > long as there isn't a PR for it. Would you like me make one and submit > it for you? i will now try and submit one myself. need to figure out how to configure send-pr on this box first (that it does not emit a bogus mail address and takes my official one instead) > 1. I just rechecked, and I didn't even bump PORTREVISION, so there won't = be > a patch conflict. I raised a false alarm. Sorry. ok > 2. PORTREVISION is the change-counter for the port itself. Has nothing > to do with the source-package's version. a-ha ;-) > 3. My patches don't affect Zope. yes, but they are good because they seem to do the Right Thing[tm] > >btw, what about having a post-install telling the user to ln -s his > >preferred version of python in /usr/local/bin on his own? i think this > >would make sense, because it's quite dangerous if /usr/local/bin/python > >gets replaced automagically. >=20 > The current version of python should own the /usr/local/bin/python > binary. Zope is the only other package that actually needs python21. >=20 > I agree regarding the danger; that's why I'm patching the old versions > of python to not do that.=20 yes, but as i said, it would perhaps make sense to emit a note of warning from the make file in post-install or elsewhere, much like the "network daemon potential security hole" warning in some ports. regards, /k --=20 > I'm not as think as you stoned I am. KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 B= F46 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8tMWaM0BPTilkv0YRAtJNAKCSN5b+OsHrN7ivOFPbJ5oqPhQhUwCghh5L rpBdNBQ/wA6qAp+AgH0oYB8= =5mxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message