From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 14:17:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C269106568E; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93878FC1D; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697606D4E7; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4B8B684492; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:17:43 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Kostik Belousov References: <200810131300.m9DD0MaR076808@svn.freebsd.org> <20081013131047.GA84887@freebsd.org> <86skr0zlav.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20081013133140.GQ7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:17:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20081013133140.GQ7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> (Kostik Belousov's message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:31:40 +0300") Message-ID: <86od1oziig.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs fs/procfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:17:54 -0000 Kostik Belousov writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Roman Divacky writes: > > > what about commiting this to note this change? > > > + A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed. Man= y Linux > > > + ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port. > > "A serious problem was fixed"? Really? And if none of that software > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports? > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes, > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact. Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread Roman's proposed relnotes entry. Do you think it gives a correct impression of the nature and severity of the issue? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no