From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 05:59:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E5216A4CE; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE7243D1F; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:59:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])6CC33153E8; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:59:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 13967AA096; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:59:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:59:06 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040224135906.GG6451@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Eikemeier , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200402241327.i1ODRigf036524@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402241327.i1ODRigf036524@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: matthias.andree@gmx.de Subject: Re: ports/63306: [MAINTAINER] databases/db42: add patch.4.2.52.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:59:11 -0000 USE_LIBTOOL does not work for this port, as is documented, Makefile.db mentions: # Do not use GNU_CONFIGURE or USE_LIBTOOL, it adds a --prefix option # we do not want in CONFIGURE_ARGS, and currently (2003-12-09) breaks # with its non-standard ${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT}. The .la file situation isn't at all clear either. The porter's handbook doesn't mention anything, and a ports@ query a few weeks ago just led to general shrugging. One person didn't need it, the next one did, so I'll choose whatever the upstream does to meet applications' expectations. If you want ports to USE_LIBTOOL, first make sure that GNU_CONFIGURE and CONFIGURE_SCRIPT can work together. -- Matthias Andree