From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Mon Nov  2 23:44:27 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3059A25474
 for <freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2015 23:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits))
 (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B66F1625
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Nov 2015 23:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:1811:2419:4e02:a528:e68b:dc0a:bd8c] (unknown
 [IPv6:2a02:1811:2419:4e02:a528:e68b:dc0a:bd8c])
 by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55CE91A165;
 Tue,  3 Nov 2015 00:44:21 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3106\))
Subject: Re: pf NAT and VNET Jails
From: Kristof Provost <kp@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151798.z4nmEG8eZc@hbsd-dev-laptop>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:44:19 +0100
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <089B842B-FE96-4016-BE6E-A63182422A9C@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CAExMvs=jVsASLyiqU9nTpir0Hy_s_DfChgf4XKeGWv-8yojNBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6607014.lfu2kQizLV@hbsd-dev-laptop>
 <D9FD5254-DA54-40B0-B4D6-71F65EB3B84A@FreeBSD.org>
 <20151798.z4nmEG8eZc@hbsd-dev-laptop>
To: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3106)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:44:27 -0000


> On 02 Nov 2015, at 15:07, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Monday, 02 November 2015 02:59:03 PM Kristof Provost wrote:
>>=20
>> Can you add your pf.conf too?
>>=20
>> I=E2=80=99ll try upgrading my machine to something beyond 290228 to =
see if I can
>> reproduce it. It=E2=80=99s on r289635 now, and seems to be fine. My =
VNET jails
>> certainly get their traffic NATed.
>=20
> Sorry about that! I should've included it. It's pasted here: =
http://ix.io/lLI
>=20
> It's probably not the most concise. This is a laptop that can have one =
of=20
> three interfaces online: re0 (ethernet on the laptop), wlan0 (you can =
guess=20
> what that is), or ue0 (usb tethering from my phone). I used to be able =
to=20
> specify NATing like that and pf would automatically figure out which =
outgoing=20
> device to use. Seems like that's broken now.
>=20
I=E2=80=99ve updated my machine and things still seem to be working.
As you said, it=E2=80=99s probably related to the multiple nat entries.

I=E2=80=99ll have to make a test setup, which=E2=80=99ll take a bit of =
time, especially=20
since I=E2=80=99m messing with  the host machine at the moment.

Regards,
Kristof