From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun May  5 22:10:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA09363
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 5 May 1996 22:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA09358
          Sun, 5 May 1996 22:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id WAA06040; Sun, 5 May 1996 22:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605060510.WAA06040@Root.COM>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG,
        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: MBUFs leaking? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 May 1996 07:38:34 CDT."
             <Pine.BSI.3.93.960505073524.24623A-100000@sasami> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 22:10:17 -0700
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>On Sun, 5 May 1996, J Wunsch wrote:
>> > options     NMBCLUSTERS=4096
>> It does the same.  You might however have to quote the right-hand side
>> to protect it from config misinterpreting it.
>
>Humm...  I've got 2 stable boxes... One very recent (2 days ago max)
>and the other about 3 weeks ago.  On the older, I've got NMBCLUSTERS
>at 8192 as its a busy webserver and front end box.  The other refuses
>to obey the options NMBCLUSTERS and only allocates about 180k to
>mbufs.  I've played with maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS, and others and no effect.

   I can't explain this. There must be something interacting with this, like a
user process limit or something. There haven't been any kernel changes that
would affect this.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project