From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 22:26:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A105716A41F; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com) Received: from orsfmr005.jf.intel.com (fmr20.intel.com [134.134.136.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2ED43D6A; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com) Received: from orsfmr100.jf.intel.com (orsfmr100.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.16]) by orsfmr005.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id jATMQTNP032145; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:26:29 GMT Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206]) by orsfmr100.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id jATMO1NB009928; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:26:29 GMT Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56]) by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005112914262816010 ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:26:28 -0800 Received: from orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.209]) by orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:26:28 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:26:27 -0800 Message-ID: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E03907B15@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Worked in RELENG_5, fails in RELENG_6 thread-index: AcX1MMGPN/hXjIcBSIOT0/yAvduYHQAAwnZA From: "Moore, Robert" To: "John Baldwin" , "David Kelly" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2005 22:26:28.0935 (UTC) FILETIME=[F13CAD70:01C5F533] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.7.209.16 Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Worked in RELENG_5, fails in RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:26:59 -0000 FACS does not replace FADT. FACS is an ACPI 1.0 table as well. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > acpi@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Baldwin > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:47 PM > To: David Kelly > Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Worked in RELENG_5, fails in RELENG_6 >=20 > On Tuesday 29 November 2005 04:19 pm, David Kelly wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:52:34PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:46 pm, David Kelly wrote: > > > > Downloaded and FLASHed BIOS from A06 to Dell's latest, A09 this > > > > evening. No improvement. Also built and installed a new kernel from > > > > cvsup this afternoon. No improvement. > > > > > > But 5.4 works fine with ACPI enabled? This is the machine that even > > > acpidump chokes on, yes? Does acpidump work ok on 5.4? > > > > "acpidump -t -d" stops after 31 lines and says, "acpidump: FACS is > > corrupt" on stderr. See > > http://home.hiwaay.net/~dkelly/opus-acpidump-d-t.txt > > > > "acpidump -d" runs without error and emits 2754 lines. See > > http://home.hiwaay.net/~dkelly/opus-acpidump-d.txt > > > > ACPI worked with 5.4 so I never had a reason to acpidump then. Could I > > boot a 5.4 CDROM to test ACPI? Without much effort have put my hands on > > a "5.3-RELEASE Live Filesystem" CDROM that should make a good test. > > > > There was an issue briefly with ACPI in 5.0 or 5.1, very likely in a > > prerelease. > > > > Absolultely certain ACPI worked prior to 6.0 because among other things > > ACPI installed a power button handler which performed a clean shutdown > > (same as ctl-alt-del) rather than brute force yank-the-plug crash. >=20 > Ok. BTW, FACS is an ACPI 2.0 table that replaces the FADT (I think), so > if > your BIOS has an option to only do ACPI 1.0, you can try that to see if it > fixes the problem. >=20 > -- > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =3D http://www.FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"