Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:46:47 +0000 From: Dominic Mitchell <dom@semantico.com> To: Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> Cc: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by whom?) Message-ID: <20010122094647.A7853@semantico.com> In-Reply-To: <3A6B042E.659C716D@nisser.com> References: <3A6A50F3.307C9E06@nisser.com> <20010121103324.A297@frolic.no-support.loc> <3A6B042E.659C716D@nisser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Roelof Osinga wrote: > Grand gesture. Laudable even. Yeah, that PAM sure seems to've > become popular. The Courier IMAP port also insisted upon its > installation. Insisted in that fiddling with the makefile only > resulted in failure to configure. But that's a whole different > story. Would it be a good idea to start using /etc/pam.d ala RedHat, instead of the monolithic /etc/pam.conf? As far as I can see the support is already there, it's just not being used due to the presence of the /etc/pam.conf. This would make installing PAM entries far easier for the ports. -Dom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010122094647.A7853>