Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:13:05 +0000 From: Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev.ix.0.queueX.interrupt_rate Message-ID: <CA%2Bb0zg9YpHbx0fMtyF5JoYtLL9BL5AsFYyTUGOCf2RcMt-KN8g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150824192926.GL3158@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20150824192926.GL3158@zxy.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What's strange about it? The interrupt rate only changes if traffic goes out on the queue, and so if whatever applications you use don't utilize the core the queue is bound to, then the interrupt rate won't change. Or are you confused about the units? I know ixl(4) uses usecs instead of Hz, so ix(4) should probably change to use that at some point. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 12:29 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > I have '82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' and see > strange: > > # sysctl dev.ix.0 | grep interrupt_rate > dev.ix.0.queue7.interrupt_rate: 500000 > dev.ix.0.queue6.interrupt_rate: 500000 > dev.ix.0.queue5.interrupt_rate: 31250 > dev.ix.0.queue4.interrupt_rate: 31250 > dev.ix.0.queue3.interrupt_rate: 31250 > dev.ix.0.queue2.interrupt_rate: 500000 > dev.ix.0.queue1.interrupt_rate: 500000 > dev.ix.0.queue0.interrupt_rate: 500000 > > Last -stable, no tuning. Is this normal? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bb0zg9YpHbx0fMtyF5JoYtLL9BL5AsFYyTUGOCf2RcMt-KN8g>