Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:11:45 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks Message-ID: <4D875CA1.8020607@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110321100428.GN90300@e.0x20.net> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103210906001.48840@gw.reifenberger.com> <20110321100428.GN90300@e.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/21/11 05:04, Lars Engels wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: >> Hi, >> yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following >> remarks: >> >> - At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab >> - Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage? >> - The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible > - UFS-labeling does not work > > I let bsdinstall partition the disk automatically and edited the > proposed partitions to add labels, but after the first boot, neither > fstab nor /dev/label showed any labels. The labels are gpart labels, so they show up, e.g., under /dev/gpt. They aren't currently used to set up fstab, as it is somewhat difficult to predict their path. -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D875CA1.8020607>