From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 23:43:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226F716A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from etustar.ze.tum.de (etustar.ze.tum.de [129.187.39.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF96043D2D for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:43:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from estartu@etustar.ze.tum.de) Received: from etustar.ze.tum.de (estartu@localhost.ze.tu-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1]) by etustar.ze.tum.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1H7hiDl050237; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:43:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from estartu@etustar.ze.tum.de) Received: (from estartu@localhost) by etustar.ze.tum.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1H7hiAN050236; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:43:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from estartu) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:43:44 +0100 From: Gerhard Schmidt To: python@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040217074344.GA39390@augusta.de> References: <200402161558.36405.x@Vex.Net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402161558.36405.x@Vex.Net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Zope 2.6.4 vs 2.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:43:47 -0000 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:58:36PM -0500, Tim Middleton wrote: >=20 > So Zope 2.6.4 was released simultaneously with Zope 2.7 finally a few day= s=20 > ago. (I just noticed.) >=20 > Those theoretical discussions we had here a month or so ago about how bes= t to=20 > organise the Zope 2.7 style installation are now are not so theoretical. >=20 > But still one wonders... since both of these versions are released at onc= e,=20 > should FreeBSD support a seperate Zope 2.7 port, while maintaining 2.6.x?= =20 >=20 > Personally, I'd like to forget anything before 2.7 existed as quickly as= =20 > possible. (-: And I see Zope.org just offers 2.7 for download by default = now=20 > on the download page.=20 > > Hopefully someone's working on the 2.7 port already? How's it coming? I have an working zope2.7 port. The Problem is the 2.6.x and 2.7 have totaly different directory structures, so an easy upgrade from 2.6.x to 2.7 isn't= =20 posibel. We should move the zope2.6 port to www/zope-old and bring www/zope to 2.7=20 bye=20 Estartu P.S. The port i=B4ve created is attached to this mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | Nick : estartu IRC : Estartu | Fischbachweg 3 | | PGP Public Key 86856 Hiltenfingen | Privat: estartu@augusta.de | auf Anfrage/ Tel: 08232 77 36 4 | Dienst: schmidt@ze.tu-muenchen.de | on request Fax: 08232 77 36 3 | | --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: leZCkkx1ATs7pKlnv89jJlUWw47KxVTH iQCVAwUBQDHGLgzx22nOTJQRAQHBbQP/bG+7/FNQUiPZmE+WQOSEQIaVyRoovja1 E+1bV9I+ju+q9f4GysH5PabepWQ+B3qQPQDDsLqzFP3d83rdc6+0Hfc5HyTLwbKD fvq6oY0uj+lmkjEq9ExTmIDuMAskSikuiQogDZdeyqo0ipIijXy17QHxTT46oOgF OColpyifOUY= =eDWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX--