From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 21 15:32:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD3A106566C; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089AC8FC19; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfs35 with SMTP id s35so5538435yhf.13 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6SRG6IJ2L44flKx1KPrVuxh89FjfX+26ckMXV00ZE+E=; b=VuckSj1Pxqmb9I+3+xl0HQ1fSBsxZbCcQ426pCuWyNIsQlTH519aOiTL9qNA1+rjmV IbOuMiub/HVLxctpaiSJf4c52YgcZQp1Adi2kcgv/3uv/cVD+wfUeagARI7mycxHbCu2 8xdXCixVuWXgl0B0kJDPSkaJ+odRoD+W6avTOFzAiLIRpcxbfmoUOcPQjAZYGiaobMCp SroQA9bZc5PnBXoN34DdoA2YOpQoHIHkkMZk8Vzzr6RcTw1dl8+X1wG6DkhBe6EnWFEJ RA7jWv4p3wpEWADiCG7nq6n0B4hFsCHB0u5mkEvQwzrS39EpmQGvmeQbyZUF/ZxVK0uP G+ug== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.220.136 with SMTP id pw8mr7039189igc.1.1342884735117; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.136.7 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:32:15 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0dhaV19AmNR3SqpT39eNiwtRLyE Message-ID: From: Robert Millan To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Kostik Belousov Subject: KBI bump in r227697? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:32:16 -0000 Hi all, Kostik, I was just reading through r227697, and it seems to me that this commit changes KBI. Shouldn't this have a __FreeBSD_version bump? My concern is with external file system modules like fuse4bsd (although on first sight it doesn't seem that fuse4bsd is affected). http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2011-November/044647.html -- Robert Millan