Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:36:37 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>, Antony Mawer <lists@mawer.org>, rafan@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help needed to fix contrib/ee crash/exit when receiving SIGWINCH Message-ID: <86bpjmkxre.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <permail-20091031133047f0889e8400007da2-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> (Alexander Best's message of "Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:30:47 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <permail-20091031133047f0889e8400007da2-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> writes: > great news. so should the PR be closed or should it remain in patched sta= te in > order for 7.x to get patched? Set it to "patched" until you've merged the patch to 6, 7 and 8 (IIRC, 6 has the new ncurses as well) > another question: how about our ncurses base version in general? should it > remain the ncurses release version with our own patchset or would it be b= etter > to update it more frequently with the official ncurses patchsets? i guess= this > is the way acpi in the base dir is being handled. vendor updates get > integrated on the fly into the base dir. I would just import releases, unless there is a compelling reason to import a patchset (i.e. it fixes a serious bug and we can't easily apply just that one patch). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bpjmkxre.fsf>