From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 03:08:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753C016A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:08:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595BE43D1F for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:08:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) i9S34ra2085056; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:04:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (pc1.oakwoodazabu1-unet.ocn.ne.jp [220.110.140.201]) by mail.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.2/meer) with ESMTP id i9S34nRw025679; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:04:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:04:47 +0900 Message-ID: From: gnn@neville-neil.com To: David Gilbert In-Reply-To: <16768.22876.926445.412412@canoe.dclg.ca> References: <16767.52282.937187.190919@canoe.dclg.ca> <6.1.2.0.0.20041027124606.09c40768@64.7.153.2> <16767.53956.366966.737912@canoe.dclg.ca> <6.1.2.0.0.20041027131824.10140c90@64.7.153.2> <16768.22876.926445.412412@canoe.dclg.ca> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.5 Emacs/21.2 (powerpc-apple-darwin) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: "George V. Neville-Neil" cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: IPSec on current. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:08:18 -0000 At Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:28:44 -0400, David Gilbert wrote: > > >>>>> "George" == George V Neville-Neil writes: > > George> At Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:19:33 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> At 12:54 PM 27/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote: > >> > >> >So ... are you saying that FAST_IPSEC excludes INET6? > >> > >> As far as I know, yes. It needs to be disabled. In the BUGS section > >> of the man page, "There is presently no support for IPv6." > >> > >> Perhaps sam@freebsd.org can confirm. > > George> Just for the record, yes, FAST_IPSEC does not support INET6. > > It's also possible that the division panic and the GPF panic were with > and without INET6. I not on the machine at the momment. > > Not supporting IPv6 is less of a showstopper than not supporting > FAST_IPSEC as the later is required (for isntance) BGP. Yes, I was just clearing up the point. As to the actual panic, I may have time to look at it but I'm hoping others will chime in. Thanks, George