Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:07:29 +0100 From: Felix 'buebo' Kakrow <buebo@buebo.de> To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: State of gvinum RAID-5 Message-ID: <20061110170729.5414df98@gwen.pulp-friction.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_HIjdFFjXwvYYxmHWXSvD_6v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello List, I tried gvinum RAID-5 with a 5-Stable around the time when 5.1 or 5.2 was released (afair) and back then it basically sucked big time. Raid worked as long as nothing failed, but reconstructing a drive was somewhere between very painful and not possible. Now I will have to upgrade hardware soon, which means I could switch from NetBSD (and Raidframe) to FreeBSD (with gvinum) again. I would like to because NetBSD seems to have some kind of memory leak in connection with Samba and large or many files, but I'd rather have a somewhat unstable Samba than an unstable Raid, so what's the state of affairs? Cheers Felix P.S.: I've tried google but have not come up with anything useful short of reading the actual code, which is way over my level. --=20 "A discordian shall always use the official discordian document=20 numbering system." -- The Second Discordian Commandment --Sig_HIjdFFjXwvYYxmHWXSvD_6v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Enrcypt your mail with GnuPG! iD8DBQFFVKPEh3KJlP+0/PsRApGQAKCe6UPbUGpycXkiDnqBdz8soxd8jgCfUf6m yz+/J2BXDFJpyKoqSvhLJhA= =VRuk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_HIjdFFjXwvYYxmHWXSvD_6v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061110170729.5414df98>