From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Nov  9 19:20:24 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 508)
	id AAC7D37B401; Sat,  9 Nov 2002 19:20:23 -0800 (PST)
To: imp@bsdimp.com
Subject: Re: bluetooth
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20021109.001225.94555950.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-Id: <20021110032023.AAC7D37B401@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat,  9 Nov 2002 19:20:23 -0800 (PST)
From: julian@FreeBSD.ORG (Julian Elischer)
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> I'd go one step farther.  I'd say that it would be insane to have more
> than one bluetooth stack for FreeBSD.  I'd go farther and say that it
> would be insane to have more than one bluetooth stack for *BSD.
> Bluetooth is too big and specailized for there to be much benefit in
> competing stacks.

The Netgraph stack is more an idea than code at this stage.. are you
suggesting that we do not commit our working stack because they might
sometime write a stack?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message