Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:19:45 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r548253 - in head/graphics: . glx-utils mesa-demos Message-ID: <lfhc-dxvi-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20200914164152.fe53cfb4b24b1d184e646c0f@bidouilliste.com> (Emmanuel Vadot's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:41:52 %2B0200") References: <202009111728.08BHShvE009018@repo.freebsd.org> <20200914164152.fe53cfb4b24b1d184e646c0f@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> writes: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:28:43 +0000 (UTC) > Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> Author: jbeich >> Date: Fri Sep 11 17:28:43 2020 >> New Revision: 548253 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/548253 >> >> Log: >> graphics/glx-utils: add new port >> >> A few popular OpenGL X11 demos from Mesa: >> >> - glxinfo prints capabilities of OpenGL driver >> - glxgears draws rotating gears and prints FPS >> >> Inspired by: D26077, glx-utils (CentOS, PkgSrc), glxinfo (AUR, MacPorts, Nix) >> Motivated by: testing GLX on Xwayland, avoiding cruft and extra deps >> >> Added: >> head/graphics/glx-utils/ >> head/graphics/glx-utils/Makefile (contents, props changed) >> head/graphics/glx-utils/distinfo (contents, props changed) >> head/graphics/glx-utils/pkg-descr (contents, props changed) >> Modified: >> head/graphics/Makefile (contents, props changed) >> head/graphics/mesa-demos/Makefile (contents, props changed) >> > > Saw this commit on Friday evening and decided to not answer as I > wanted to spend a nice weekend. > Now that I'm back, what the fuck ? Seriously what the fuck ? > > You see a review where a commiter start to address a problem, decide > that it's not the right way to do it and instead of talking to him you > just commit your way of solving the problem ? > And now we're suppose to adapt to your way of handling this problem > without prior discussion ? > It's freebsd-ports, not jbeich-ports. D26077 didn't have feedback for ~1 month. I've added glx-utils mainly for myself (see Motivated by) after analyzing prior art. Why do I need to justify every port for you? If you don't like the approach disapprove/reject patches touching your or x11@ ports. Please, blame me for regressions or more work instead. > I still don't understand that you're not willing to send a email > stating your plan before commiting stuff. There was no hurry in > commiting this without prior discussion. This is not the first time > that you do that and you still don't understand. Burnout and non-zero backlog. For example, I wouldn't have worked on improving mesa-demos even if the planning decided creating a separate port wasn't a good idea. For unrelated example, planning didn't help D25020. > It's really demotivating *not* working with you. Sorry, I don't like close cooperation. Collaborating on a common goal is fine but if you want to micromanage maybe just do the work yourself.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lfhc-dxvi-wny>