From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 29 19:01:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: java@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38D116A4DA for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD9943EA4 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x66so176423pye for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:55:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=DAfBjFMAQnWU/F492pR9bf20fErTkTQJ0LHIVy9Rvlc6xwaPQcbSni++Ow0gw79WcLeQyv+pscrZNmSNjYgVe99rxIl9auXRL/xuNAT4fl+jUygJunZenJxW1W1N4q2A+2FHxn3zwJPYzxa/v35O6rQLiK6vG4GBvP0BpjF72bc= Received: by 10.35.78.9 with SMTP id f9mr1136877pyl; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.105.10 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:55:45 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: java@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9783ecd696aaaf56 Cc: Subject: linux-sun-jre15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:01:23 -0000 I created subj based on linux-sun-jdk15. Can I commit it with maintainer set to java@? I need it because I want to cut down on bandwidth usage at some places. I'll also introduce npapi functionality into this jre port, but that's another story. There's probably no need for a repocopy as the diff exceeds the size of the port itself.