From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 21 17:37:01 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1369F16A419
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adityaa.kiran@gmail.com)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D069713C4A7
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adityaa.kiran@gmail.com)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1293966waf
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
	b=dsUZLn54zgUEMOZjSHuROxqnAW2w0xfCRRRsB+WNBkLssWej38MjhNi0zneQdiNjU/U9SF7PG5HjCmz2abMMErrbqwwskVZGaWwZ20LNFA2COQhf+p8yZOSHil+8czckD8pOaZc6Af8mKIv3iv5vMzMNz/MDu0ESixoVl7jwOsg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
	b=SQ3257Q41ytGldUMTk6nzG3jwQ/x5d6n45LKUMbQC24cY+zCBg6IxhfitgtM3zD+V0Y2imakeJIgieU23Z5QD9J6qU8I7HLV2ow1jyP1R1SZLgFA2IJoNs9sJItedMJPlPfvUuvdig4dULPXCYRJy99KndCD2THM9JJYRtkPfiE=
Received: by 10.115.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr3030746wal.1187717819304;
	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.72.3 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <994cd1cf0708211036j72c84e37iaae4b56274bf9798@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:06:59 +0530
From: "aditya kiran" <adityaa.kiran@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: Racoon - socket based policy negotiation - is it available?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:37:01 -0000

Hi,
I was wondering why racoon doesnt support negotiation for per-socket
policies? Is it because racoon maintains its database based on src and dst
addresses and a port based one doesnt always has one?

Is this support is planned for any future ipsec-tools release? It is just
mentioned
at http://www.freshports.org/security/racoon/ that racoon will not negotiate
per socket policies . But wil this support is planned for any future racoon
release?
Any information on this is highly appreciated..
Thanks,
Adityaa