From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 26 15:20: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F135F37B404 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:20:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2QNK3Y02564; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:20:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:20:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203262320.g2QNK3Y02564@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alan Eldridge Subject: Re: ports/36345: New port: unrtf - converter from RTF to HTML, LaTeX, PS, ... Reply-To: Alan Eldridge Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36345; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alan Eldridge To: Oliver Braun , FreeBSD Bugs Cc: Subject: Re: ports/36345: New port: unrtf - converter from RTF to HTML, LaTeX, PS, ... Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:16:33 -0500 On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:48:21PM +0100, Oliver Braun wrote: >> He's using the GNU name without permission, it looks like. I'd suggest >> that we not perpetuate that mistake. > >Yes, I think you are right. I have simply overlooked that. Should it be >enough to change the pkg-descr or should we throw away this port? No, just change the description. What *we* say is our problem. What he says on his website is *his* problem. -- AlanE "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message