From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 20 22:25:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DFE106566B for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4CC8FC0C for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8KMSFSi023700; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:28:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: barbara In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:25:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1253485538.38842.175.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: gnome Subject: Re: x11-toolkits/py-gnome-extras: PKGNAMESUFFIX usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:25:37 -0000 --=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 19:00 +0200, barbara wrote: > For curiosity, can someone comment/explain me about the usage of PKGNAMES= UFFIX in x11-toolkits/py-gnome-extras? > My curiosity is originated by a problem I noticed with a "non-gnome" port= . Refer to the following two messages I've posted in the freebsd-ports mail= ing list: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057098.ht= ml > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057103.ht= ml I think this comes from an archaic limitation that port names should not contain '-'. It could probably be merged into the PORTNAME now. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkq2q+EACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4f8mgCfQnN4SQCh2+hkANFul06faJOH t0gAoKsawcRqD3BRcmwKn6H2eKQszNCG =hSQ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-P62D626cpEfA52VQCr7y--