From owner-freebsd-net Wed Mar 21 12: 7:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from samar.sasi.com (samar.sasken.com [164.164.56.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DA837B744 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:07:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sseth@sasken.com) Received: from samar (samar.sasi.com [164.164.56.2]) by samar.sasi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA02406; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:04:07 +0530 (IST) Received: from suns3.sasi.com ([10.0.36.3]) by samar.sasi.com; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:04:05 +0000 (IST) Received: from localhost (sseth@localhost) by suns3.sasi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09154; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:04:03 +0530 (IST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:04:03 +0530 (IST) From: Satyajeet Seth To: Cc: Brahma Naidu Golla Subject: Routing Problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi I am having a machine with 3 interfaces, fxp0, nge0 and nge1. nge0 and nge1 are pseudo ethernet interfaces implemented using 'ng_eiface' netgraph nodes in freebsd-current. I wish that the response to a ping from host1(some machine on LAN) to fxp0/nge0/nge1 should come from the respective interface. But it comes from the interface given by "route get 'host1'" unless we manually do a "route change 'host1' -ifp 'interface'" host1 should be able to ping to fxp0, nge0 and nge1 simultaneously and the responses should come from the respective interfaces. Is it possible to do this dynamically using ipfw,natd stateful rules? Or, perhaps there is some other better way? This mail has also been posted to freebsd-ipfw. Thanks Satya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message