From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Sep 30  5:15:47 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3577814FFD
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 05:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.037 #1)
	id 11Wf7M-0005vx-00; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:15:24 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: bytong <bytong@yahoo.com>
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [bytong@yahoo.com: (no subject)] 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Sep 1999 17:03:56 +0200."
             <19990929170355.A3481@freno.cs.tu-berlin.de> 
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:15:24 +0200
Message-ID: <22812.938693724@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 17:03:56 +0200, Wolfram Schneider wrote:

> It's very simple ,but the result amaze me.The parent process return
> 246,181 which express the process id and its parent process id,the
> problem is child process which return 247,1 ,child process id is
> 247,but its parent's process id is 1 not 246,why?

Looks like the forked process is disassociated with the controlling
terminal.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message