From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 12:18:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0652816A525 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A617143D55 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:18:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 41362 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Mar 2004 20:18:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 20:18:51 -0000 Message-ID: <4061EC4D.9020504@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:15:09 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: <200403232227.i2NMRQn5042762@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040324164155.GA4737@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: removing src/usr.bin/doscmd ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:18:54 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 8:38 PM +0100 3/24/04, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > >> "David O'Brien" writes: >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> > > Log: >> > > Remove doscmd from the base system now that it lives in >> > > the ports tree. >> > >> > Did you *really* have consensus for this? >> >> Yes. > > > That was not my impression. I had thought that it was going to > stay until 6.0. (not that I care much either way, I'm just saying > that it *was* my impression that a fair number of people wanted it > to stay in the base system for now). > To be fair, there are other packages in /usr/port/emulators that are significantly better than doscmd. However, I'm open to putting doscmd into the disc1 package set for releases if that would help people feel better. Scott