From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 15:18:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DF437B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hnlmail3.hawaii.rr.com (hnlmail3.hawaii.rr.com [24.25.227.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8433443F75 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:18:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@mtsolidarity.com) Received: from mtsolidarity.com ([204.210.96.104]) by hnlmail3.hawaii.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Wed, 7 May 2003 12:18:53 -1000 Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:18:56 -1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Mike To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20030507165554.03de4d70@asylum.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) Subject: Re: Searching for Multi Processors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 22:18:58 -0000 On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 11:58 AM, dave wrote: > At 04:24 PM 5/7/2003, Mike Solis wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if FreeBSD is detecting both my processors. >> I reconfigured my kernel to include SMP. I used dmesg | less to view >> which devices and notice some changes such as this: >> >> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard >> cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 >> cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 >> io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00178011, at 0xfec00000 >> >> and then further down: >> >> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! >> >> My estimate is that things are up and running smoothly but I'm not >> 100% sure. >> >> Thanks for the help, > > > Looks like you are good to go. > > If you run top you can look at both cpu's in the "C" column labeled > as 0 and 1 as well as the processes associated with each one. > > dave Thanks for the hint about top. Both processors are up and running. Mike