From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 28 11:12:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA21476 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 11:12:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA21463 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id SAA26842; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:35:54 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199804281635.SAA26842@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Bandwidth throttling etc. To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:35:54 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: kjc@csl.sony.co.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 28, 98 09:33:17 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > wasn't setsockopt changed to do > 108 in a recent -current? (2 weeks ago?) > > have you a new -current? i am running -stable, and don't want to go -current (at least, not for a thing like this where a one-line change does the job). would it be possible to bring the update to setsockopt() into -stable ? Looks like a simple fix (haven't looked at the code in detail, but what's more than malloc'ing a different, larger mbuf ?) cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message