From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:36:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A336106564A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF5C8FC14 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so3158042dad.13 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u0NCCiXvSKYQ98clnZJJZ1VQwKTKSTWilggt8fpA5+M=; b=M6CqjhSaP5377fQWCaTd+BWWzbIhpooQsFz8q+Y34A37LEMJHuQJr6oygcCc3Y0UTA 1bTKw1jCmuYsyHJbBRemcUlSqdPum/SXBGQlqWy36aecIpAY23S6iOWljrtGZngHRYNB zz5cK4WvCEihV6rNaWMuPZrNTfs8bTNsnnapuHD2aWbY2FJv3wa+5aa6ZhPSDF9DTDD0 XThpDbs47lBd3GVWRkM8ClLP3x2Crn4NMxUc609tUr7GELkKd1kefbhyi+JiZxyDJY+v J6YJdKb9Ay/KStixDpEtjK2+ifaXbOs4V1MdrHT8G9VYivRDPTP2KwbpOkAGYyVLpGVP T/cQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.226.226 with SMTP id rv2mr11502601pbc.101.1339702600597; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.143.91.18 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:36:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120614155748.GC40355@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> References: <4FD236D4.6090409@norma.perm.ru> <20120609170721.GA40355@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <4FD98EC1.50200@norma.perm.ru> <20120614155748.GC40355@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:36:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YNfIDP5ksWv601acTz9UqkoI6J0 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: if_ipsec X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:36:41 -0000 Hm, I remember some reasons down in the deep, distant past as to why ipsec implementations moved away from tunnel mode == tunnel interfaces. When I was being a network engineer during the day, I constantly hated having to implement tunnels using traffic maps rather than actual interfaces. Chances are bz@ would know. I suggest asking him. Adrian