From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Jun 29 10: 4:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from pobox.rwwa.com (pobox.rwwa.com [216.254.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5E337B711 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:04:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from witr@rwwa.com) Received: from rwwa.com (spooky.rwwa.com [192.124.97.13]) by pobox.rwwa.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA96283; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:15:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from witr@rwwa.com) Message-Id: <200006291715.NAA96283@pobox.rwwa.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Cc: David Bauer Subject: Re: Netgear FA410TX - ed0: device timeout? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:51 -0400 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org :- If the card works under Win95, try using the same address/irq in the :- FreeBSD configuration as the card uses under Win95. Interestingly enough, I was suffering from the same problem with an older FA410TX card that *was* working fine with 228PAO until I decided to upgrade to 40REL. The above advice worked for me, with the settings: io 0x120-0x13f config 0x20 "ed0" 11 This card has exactly *one* config tuple (the 0x20 one). Also, I'm using the latest version of if_ed.c in the releng_4 branch, but I have no idea if that helps or hinders. :-But the error looks more like the autonegotiation not working :-correctly. I may be wrong, but I don't think that will cause the "ed0: device timeout" thing. That message happens when the card isn't interrupting correctly. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message