From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 13:13:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627CFA54 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rabe@uugrn.org) Received: from mail.uugrn.org (mail.uugrn.org [IPv6:2a03:2500:1:6:b::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B1D9DD for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rabe.uugrn.org (rabe.uugrn.org [IPv6:2a03:2500:1:6:19::]) by mail.uugrn.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r19DDXIB098192 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:13:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe@uugrn.org) Received: from rabox.fritz.box (rabe@rabe.uugrn.org [164.177.171.25]) by rabe.uugrn.org (8.14.5/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r19DDWhZ098188 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:13:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe@uugrn.org) Received: from rabox.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rabox.fritz.box (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r19DDUdl020723 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:13:30 +0100 Received: (from rabe@localhost) by rabox.fritz.box (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r19DDUfh020722 for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:13:30 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: rabox.fritz.box: rabe set sender to rabe@uugrn.org using -f Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:13:30 +0100 From: Raphael Eiselstein To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ? Message-ID: <20130209131330.GF4018@ma.sigsys.de> References: <20130208201503.GB4018@ma.sigsys.de> <20130208220108.GC4018@ma.sigsys.de> <86ehgpabwi.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qp4W5+cUSnZs0RIF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86ehgpabwi.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 13:13:45 -0000 --qp4W5+cUSnZs0RIF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:51:09PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > Have you tried to set >=20 > # WITH_BDB_VER > # - User defined global variable to set Ber= keley DB version. > # _WITH_BDB_VER > # - User defined port specific variable to = set Berkeley DB > # version. > in /etc/make.conf? havn't tried yet. But for me it makes more sens to pin all ports to the *same* version of BDB.=20 Is there any problem linking db44 to *any* port?=20 in /etc/make.conf I'd set=20 ----------------------- WITH_BDB_VER=3D44 ----------------------- What will fail if I do so? (recompiling all our local packages will take 12= h+ just to find out ...) Why do we have so much versions of bdb in our ports?=20 Best Regards Raphael --=20 Raphael Eiselstein http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:freibyter@gmx.de | https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Eiselstein = =20 GnuPG: E7B2 1D66 3AF2 EDC7 9828 6D7A 9CDA 3E7B 10CA 9F2D =2E........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.. --qp4W5+cUSnZs0RIF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEWS3oACgkQnNo+exDKny1/KgCgnoeR1drXYQWIr+x1ZyzY8ccD hcUAn34wceAT8/GafWeeT4pQtH36C3LA =4uQ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qp4W5+cUSnZs0RIF--