From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 5 00:10:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C12DBA; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 00:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x229.google.com (mail-ve0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B857A30F; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 00:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id pa12so2061557veb.0 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:10:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=yPK2WNqt0VnpVQDimtivT/LLYAMD78PfEtUpczyxv6E=; b=oxBoZDM8aTn5ZQHCOSYOw/Y6KFJgODAA8WnrpoIzWVFUx3fB0dUknfAKv4rq5NDrO0 awA66tMUJN1pPlOTRsncVbi7+ZWZlhvBQF+fpcbRqmHXSwlz/+n/tQ2edC7c1TQ2Jr01 NhmcRh2KKtdt50vPh3xkUiqmqhyV0BC5U6eRotdB86yHNUeb78qg2IzLSIe8piTMkMc7 vsDWQQb2D17nxifDtXQ25lMwSBSXCDkNBMJBrUChN0FJLfL0Gt6Vd0vq/RB/tj0jMqfd aY9DQJX1oxNcLzswtnCNqqeMeYSOTzCB/+HKNALwe/KWKmrrZZP8n0fGfJclAWm2/jua HaKw== X-Received: by 10.58.238.35 with SMTP id vh3mr7441777vec.16.1396656619753; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (189-13-67-210.user.veloxzone.com.br. [189.13.67.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ga9sm21046383vdc.22.2014.04.04.17.10.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:10:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <003401cf4e7e$85ada7f0$9108f7d0$@ezwind.net> <33E3E822-1122-4E75-A5F1-E468CB7AC696@sarenet.es> <5B18150E-50A3-4609-A3C2-979435686965@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5B18150E-50A3-4609-A3C2-979435686965@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <6C000DB6-BB6A-4134-A282-03C5AD62FCF2@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) From: Tiago Ribeiro Subject: Re: Poor network performance Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 21:10:22 -0300 To: Mark Felder Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , Jay West X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 00:10:21 -0000 Em 04/04/2014, =C3=A0s 10:55, Mark Felder escreveu: >=20 > On Apr 3, 2014, at 4:26, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >=20 >> Hi Jay, >>=20 >> Tso is a nic's feature. Nothing to do with packet filtering. >>=20 >=20 > There is a known bug with TSO and pf on Xen. There is an open PR -- kern/ It 's a big mistery for me, yesterday i install one freebsd10 with pf in one= dom0 xenserver, and the performance is ok, and i don't disable TSO. But one month ago, i install freebsd 10 in one dom0 debian 6.0 , and i have p= oor performance too, and disable or enable TSO do not make diference. Sorry for my poor english.