Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:15:32 +0100 From: void <float@firedrake.org> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import NetBSD rc system Message-ID: <20010611231532.A2348@firedrake.org> In-Reply-To: <200106111854.f5BIsX728995@earth.backplane.com>; from dillon@earth.backplane.com on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:54:33AM -0700 References: <20010611174717.A77956@laptop.6bone.nl> <1795096378.20010611154930@163.net> <3B2484EA.B1F04812@DougBarton.net> <200106111800.f5BI0il25446@billy-club.village.org> <200106111854.f5BIsX728995@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:54:33AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: > > I kinda like our scheme... at least I like the single monolithic > /etc/rc.conf file. It makes maintaining and installing machines > utterly trivial whereas having a billion little files each with > one or two options in them makes maintaining and installing machines > rather difficult. I sure hope nobody is advocating doing away with > the monolithic capabilities of /etc/rc.conf! The NetBSD scheme puts code, not configuration, into separate files. It uses rc.conf. -- Ben "An art scene of delight I created this to be ..." -- Sun Ra To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010611231532.A2348>