From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 23:45:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF02937B404 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A9943FBF for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:45:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h376jkUs093616 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:45:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)h376jk28093613 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:45:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:45:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030407024249.S92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: nge not in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:45:49 -0000 Hi, Is there a reason why the MII-based nge(4) doesn't figure in GENERIC? Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >