Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:45:04 +0200 From: "Daniel Browne" <DanielB@clarotech.co.za> To: "Hajimu UMEMOTO" <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: cyrus-sasl2-2.1.20_1 Message-ID: <316F15B309F69F4CA5AB2C72BE26C215EE6CFC@prowler.clarotech.co.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If I pkg_version -vs cyrus after updating only cyrus-sasl-saslauthd,
both ports are up to date.
Is this then a problem with pkg_version?
Thanks
__________________________________
Daniel Browne
Clarotech Consulting (Pty) Ltd.
Tel: +27 21 671-5350
Fax: +27 21 671-9656
Cell: +27 83 304-5038
Web: www.clarotech.co.za
-----Original Message-----
From: Hajimu UMEMOTO [mailto:ume@FreeBSD.org]=20
Sent: 14 March 2005 12:08 PM
To: Daniel Browne
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: cyrus-sasl2-2.1.20_1
Hi,
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:47:20 +0200
>>>>> "Daniel Browne" <DanielB@clarotech.co.za> said:
DanielB> Is this port a slave port to cyrus-sasl-saslauthd?
No.
DanielB> When I update that port, this one gets updated as well. I ask
DanielB> only because is not marked as such on FreshPorts.
Since cyrus-sasl2 and cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd are built from same
source, I always update the two in sync when new release is out.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?316F15B309F69F4CA5AB2C72BE26C215EE6CFC>