From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 2 14:03:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E592A1065673 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 14:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from mx1.identry.com (on.identry.com [66.111.0.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C68D8FC13 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 14:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: (qmail 92080 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2009 14:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.110?) (jalmberg@75.127.142.66) by mx1.identry.com with ESMTPA; 2 May 2009 14:04:21 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <20090502125055.GB15913@pureftpd.org> References: <20090501085510.18a830e9@prokofiev.trutwins.homeip.net> <20090502125055.GB15913@pureftpd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Almberg Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:03:43 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Subject: Re: [pure-ftpd] Security Scan question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 14:03:51 -0000 On May 2, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Frank Denis wrote: > Hello Josh, > > Le Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:55:10AM -0500, Josh Trutwin ecrivait : >> Because I programmed a custom cart solution for one of my customers, >> their merchant account is doing a monthly server scan to check for >> known vulnerabilities. > > Great. I've had to endure these scans, myself, and I must say that they helped a lot. The scans are pretty thorough and they made me re-think some things I was doing... particularly limiting access to ports that I thought 'needed' to be open, but actually just needed to be open to a small number of outside addresses. Thank goodness for PF... would hate to try to pass one of those scans without a flexible firewall. -- John