Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 23:01:32 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> To: Bob Perry <rperry4@earthlink.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Portupgrade Stale Dependency Issue] Message-ID: <20031221230132.524b2db1.itetcu@apropo.ro> In-Reply-To: <3FE5AE4C.10401@earthlink.net> References: <3FE4DC12.1000302@earthlink.net> <20031221015710.12c81d29.itetcu@apropo.ro> <3FE5AE4C.10401@earthlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 09:29:32 -0500 Bob Perry <rperry4@earthlink.net> wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > >On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:32:34 -0500 > >Bob Perry <rperry4@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Just ran pkgdb -F per prompt from the portversion program and got > >the >following > >>two messages: > >> > >>Stale origin: 'textproc/ruby-rdoc': perhaps moved or obsoleted. > >>-> The port 'textproc/ruby-rdoc' was removed on 2003-12-15 because: > >> "integrated into ruby18 and ruby16-shim-ruby18" > >>-> Hint: ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 is not required by any other package > >>-> Hint: checking for overwritten files... > >>-> No files installed by ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 have been overwritten by > >>other packages. > >>Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [no] > >> > >>Appears as though I'm being told that ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 can be > >removed, >yet the > >>default selection re deinstall is "no". Am I missing something? > >> > >> > > > >As the hint says, you can deintsall it. After you're done with pkgdf > >-F do a portupgrade -r on ruby18 or ruby16-shim-ruby18, which ever > >you have. > > > > > Done. Just having difficulty understanding some of the logic behind > the program. "Deinstall ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 ? [yes]" is easy for me to > deal with. > > >>Second: > >>Stale dependency: gnome2-2.4.1 -> openldap-client-2.1.23 > >>(net/openldap21-client): > >>openldap-client-2.0.27 (score:76%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] What I don't know is how the percent is beeing calculated. From my experince for a percent above 75 is safe to respond yes. > >It seems that you had down-graded your open-ldap. You now have > >installed openladap 2.0.27 on you system, but when you've installed > >gmnome you had 2.1.13; you can either choose: > >a) yes (or all) and doing so will "point" gnome (or all) "to depend" > >on openldap-client-2.0.27 or > >b) no, terminate pkgbd and do a portupgrade on openldap-client to > >bring it back to 2.1.xx > > > >Choose what you need (if you have something that requires 2.0 do a if > >not do b.) > > > >>I click the default selection "no" and I'm prompted to input a new > >>dependency. > >>Assuming that I need to install openldap-client-2.1.23, I review the > >>net/openldap21-client port directory and I only find a Makefile. > >> > >> > > > >And ? That make file sets CLIENT_ONLY=yes and includes the > >../openldap21-server's Makefile so all is OK. Looking at the places > >where CLINET_ONLY appears in the Make file tells that You can define > >to have or not the docs installed and to have WITH_SASL with (Cyrus) > >SASL2 support. > > > > > This clearly shows how FreeBSD-challenged I am. > Thanks for taking the time to respond and explain this process. No problem. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031221230132.524b2db1.itetcu>