From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep  7 17:13:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA19806
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA19796;
          Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA21248; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@counterintelligence.ml.org>
cc: Drew Derbyshire <ahd@kew.com>, "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        hackers@hub.freebsd.org, support@kew.com
Subject: Re: spam and the FreeBSD mailing lists 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Sep 1997 15:36:30 PDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.96.970907153520.27199B-100000@counterintelligence.ml.org> 
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 17:12:54 -0700
Message-ID: <21245.873677574@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Good reason not to talk to them then.

> 
> Actually I was told that numerous government agencies have networks of
> machines that don't reverse out.
> 
> > The TCP/IP protocol implicitly requires public IP address to be properly
> > registered to be routed (otherwise, you don't get your ACK's back!),
> > there is no sin in requiring public e-mail addresses registered as well.
> > 
>