From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 14 21:04:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B845B1065696 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5728B8FC60 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets ([91.190.8.131]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id n7EL4UPH095935; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:04:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <4A85D15D.4020900@fgznet.ch> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:04:29 +0200 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <4A847AA5.1030701@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: 8.0-stable/releng? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:04:33 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > DM> AT> for the record, am I correct that the upcoming 8.0 branch is like this: > DM> AT> > DM> AT> svn ls svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/ > DM> AT> .. > DM> AT> 8/ > DM> AT> ? > DM> AT> > DM> AT> And not under 'releng'? > DM> AT> > DM> AT> I'm a bit confused about naming conventions, releng vs. stable. I have no > DM> AT> problem with either, but which one is the one to be used for BETA-3/RC? > DM> AT> > DM> AT> Is head becoming 9.0 soon? > DM> > DM> AFAIK, releng/8* will be created (by copying stable/8) just before 8.0-RC > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/SubversionPrimer#head-034326f06fb998e6c69d1ce308f1a14aaed51c7e > may sched a bit of light at the whole picture ;) Thanks for the answer, Robert did answer my question. I was confused about not seeing the 'different' trees in the corresponding svn directories as described in the docs. Andreas