From owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 03:46:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D01916A4B3; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avscan2.sentex.ca (avscan2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF243FB1; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:46:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avscan2.sentex.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABEF5A12D; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from avscan2.sentex.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (avscan2.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 35177-07; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by avscan2.sentex.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01D95A101; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8OAkMdK055475; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:46:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20030924064635.066624e8@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:49:51 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20030924054846.GI39556@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <20030924054846.GI39556@horsey.gshapiro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by Sentex Communications (avscan2/20030314p2) cc: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testers: sendmail update in RELENG_4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Quality Assurance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:46:25 -0000 Hi, I will be happy to test the patch on one of my busier mail routers. But I guess the question is, why not MFC 8.12.10 as it too like this patch needs to be tested in RELENG_4. So why not test the whole thing? I am sure you made this argument, but I will vote for it as well just the same :-) ---Mike At 01:48 AM 24/09/2003, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >The release engineers have asked me to put together a patch for RELENG_4 >that captures the most important security checks added to 8.12.10. >Given the closeness of the 4.9 release, there wouldn't be enough time to >test a complete MFC of 8.12.10. If you have some time during the day >Wednesday, please test the patch at: > >http://people.freebsd.org/~gshapiro/sendmail.diff > >Unfortunately, I won't be able to accommodate requests to add other >changes that people want from 8.12.10. The full 8.12.10 MFC will happen >after the RELENG_4 code freeze is lifted. > >If no problems are found, the patch will be committed Wednesday evening. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"