From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 17:01:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF87C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms1.din.or.jp (ms1.din.or.jp [210.135.65.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3365643D5C
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:01:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from satoshi@din.or.jp)
Received: from localhost (ppd01-0730.din.or.jp [210.135.82.130])
	by ms1.din.or.jp (8.11.7+Sun/3.7W) with ESMTP id i0I11Pn05045;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:01:26 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:03:23 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20040118.100323.730552313.satoshi@din.or.jp>
To: jlfenton@citlink.net
From: Satoshi Sato <satoshi@din.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4009A83F.4020208@citlink.net>
References: <20040117200034.D19BA16A4D6@hub.freebsd.org>
	<4009A83F.4020208@citlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.1.14 (Cuyahoga Valley)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:01:31 -0000

Thank you Joe,

From: Joe Fenton <jlfenton@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:25:19 -0700

> Is there some reason you run your memory in single
> channel mode as opposed to dual channel? You are
> needlessly cutting your memory throughput in half.

I totally misunderstood the memory installation.
I've read the manual and modified memory installation.

But panic after "avail memory" still occurs...

Sincerely,

----
Satoshi Sato