From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 5 13:50:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D1D1065673 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23B08FC1D for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m25Do4GO071876 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m25Do4BG071875; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:50:04 GMT Message-Id: <200803051350.m25Do4BG071875@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Dierk Sacher Cc: Subject: Re: ports/121167: net/wmwifi - marked broken for wrong reason - its not because of gcc 4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dierk Sacher List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:50:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/121167; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dierk Sacher To: Ulrich Spoerlein Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, dierk@blaxxtarz.de Subject: Re: ports/121167: net/wmwifi - marked broken for wrong reason - its not because of gcc 4.2 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:45:29 +0100 Hi, thank you for the patch. I'm using it on 7.0 on my X40 now with Windowmaker. So there is still at least one wmaker user left. Don't know how many others are still using it these days. Regards, Dierk Sacher Zitiere Ulrich Spoerlein vom Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:19:26PM +0100: > Hi, > > I know that the BROKEN line is in itself bogus and I already made a > patch for wmwifi to address the issue on 7.x. I was waiting though, as I > was wondering how many users actually use wmwifi, or if we should simply > drop the port. > > Attached is a patch, which has been compile tested on 6.2 and run-tested > on 7.0. > > Cheers, > Ulrich Spoerlein -- |----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|--< GPG Fingerprint: D14C 12BB 37A6 6745 7F4F F420 9E59 D79E A492 2A96 GPG KeyID : A4922A96 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+